ROMS: An Evaluation Tool for Romantic Myths

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In spite of the existence of references linking romantic myths with satisfaction/dissatisfaction and partner violence, there is a lack of empirical studies that analyze this link as well as tools to assess a broad taxonomy of myths. Thus, this paper proposes a list of 33 romantic myths assessed through a survey provided to a sample of 439 individuals. Additionally, the paper introduces a 33-item scale and a 31-item model composed of four factors (Possession, Abnegation, Romanticism, and Tradition). As a result, the paper concludes on an adequate structural validity and criterion, with optimal reliability values. Regression analyses suggest that Possession could be a significant predictor of violence, while Tradition could predict partner satisfaction. In sum, the paper introduces a broad list of myths (the most extensive that has been identified) and a scale of accurate psychometric features.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piñeiro, Y., Piñuela, R., & Yela, C. (2022). ROMS: An Evaluation Tool for Romantic Myths. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 1(62), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP62.1.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free