The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: A comparison of conventional and digital methods

98Citations
Citations of this article
191Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of angular and linear measurements of conventional and digital cephalometric methods. Methods: A total of 13 landmarks and 16 skeletal and dental parameters were defined and measured on pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients. The conventional and digital tracings and measurements were performed twice by the same examiner with a 6 week interval between measurements. The reliability within the method was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r2). The reproducibility between methods was calculated by paired t-test. The level of statistical significance was set at p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

AlBarakati, S. F., Kula, K. S., & Ghoneima, A. A. (2012). The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: A comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 41(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/37010910

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free