Who guards the guardians? Ian Kennedy, bioethics and the 'ideology of accountability' in British medicine

19Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article charts the history of bioethics in Britain through the work of the academic lawyer Ian Kennedy. From the late 1970s, Kennedy claimed that external oversight, which he termed 'bioethics', was needed to make medicine accountable to patients and the public. I believe these arguments provide a window onto the historical factors that generated the demand for bioethics, and help us determine why it became influential in recent decades. I detail how Kennedy's argument resonated with the Conservative enthusiasm for audit and consumer choice in the 1980s. Contrary to traditional portrayals of bioethics as a critique of medicine, I also show that Kennedy promised it would benefit doctors by improving decision making and maintaining public confidence. This analysis reframes bioethics as an important constituent of the 'audit society': fulfilling the neo-liberal demand for oversight and the medical demand for legitimacy. © 2011 The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, D. (2012, February). Who guards the guardians? Ian Kennedy, bioethics and the “ideology of accountability” in British medicine. Social History of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkr090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free