New XEN63 Gel Stent Implantation in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Two-Year Follow-Up Pilot Study

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The XEN gel stent was developed to reduce the risks of filtration surgery by standardizing the outflow of aqueous humor into the subconjunctival space. Recently, a modified version of the XEN63 gel stent was introduced. The goal of this study was to assess its efficacy and safety. Methods: This is a prospective, nonrandomized, observational, consecutive case series study at a single tertiary centre. Patients with open-angle glaucoma with above target intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximal tolerated medication were included. The primary outcome was a change of median IOP. Secondary outcomes included a change in the number of medications, complete success, needling and complication rates. Success was defined as a lowering of IOP > 20% from baseline and IOP ≤ 14 mmHg. Complete success indicated that the target IOP was reached without medications. Results: Six patients were included. The median IOP decreased from 35.5 mmHg (25.0–40.0 mmHg) at baseline to 11.5 mmHg (4.0– 15.0 mmHg, p = 0.03), and median IOP-lowering medication was reduced from 4.0 (3.0–4.0) at baseline to 0 (0–1.0, p = 0.03) after two years. Five patients (83.0%) had a complete success after two years. Two patients (33.0%) required a needling procedure. Three patients (50.0%) required an intervention due to symptomatic hypotony within the first three weeks postoperatively. Hypotony resolved completely or was asymptomatic after three months. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in both IOP and number of IOP-lowering medications. Complications were well manageable and had no long-term sequelae.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voykov, B., Nasyrov, E., Neubauer, J., & Gassel, C. J. (2023). New XEN63 Gel Stent Implantation in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Two-Year Follow-Up Pilot Study. Clinical Ophthalmology, 17, 2243–2249. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S423519

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free