Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection

16Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because discomfort caused by different approximal caries detection methods can influence their performance, the assessment of this discomfort is important. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the discomfort reported by children after the use of different diagnostic methods to detect approximal caries lesions in primary teeth: visual inspection, bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen - LFpen) and temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers. Seventy-six children aged 4 to 12 years were examined using these methods. Their discomfort was assessed using the Wong-Baker scale and compared among the methods. Visual inspection caused less discomfort than did other methods. Radiography and the LFpen presented similar levels of discomfort. Older children reported higher discomfort using temporary separation, whereas younger children reported less discomfort with the LFpen. In conclusion, radiographic, temporary separation and LFpen methods provoke higher discomfort than visual inspection.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Novaes, T. F., Matos, R., Raggio, D. P., Braga, M. M., & Mendes, F. M. (2012). Children’s discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection. Brazilian Oral Research, 26(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000200002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free