Youth leisure-time sedentary behavior questionnaire (Ylsbq): Reliability and validity in colombian university students

2Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sedentary behavior (SB) is influenced by variations in social, cultural and economic con-texts. This study assesses the test–retest reliability and validity of the Youth Leisure-time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ), a self-report tool that examines total and domain-specific SB in a cohort of young adults from Colombia. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 447 Colombian college students (52.8% men; mean (± standard deviation) age of 19.55 ± 2.54 years). To assess the reliability of the YLSBQ, Kappa statistics (k) were used. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to determine validity. The Cronbach alpha for the 12 behaviors of the YLSBQ showed a good-to-excellent internal consistency (0.867, ranging from 0.715–0.935). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated that 10 items (83.0%) and two items (17.0%) showed excellent and good reliability, respectively. Furthermore, ICC between the total sedentary time was 0.926 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.912 − 0.939), which was interpreted as excellent. The goodness-of-fit tests provided evidence that overall, a four-factor solution was an adequate fit with the time scores. In conclusion, the YLSBQ could be considered a reliable, valid and usable tool for the assessment of SB in young adults in a Latin American country. We found that the psychometric properties of the questionnaire were similar to those of the original Spanish validation study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atencio-Osorio, M. A., Carrillo-Arango, H. A., Correa-Rodríguez, M., Rivera, D., Castro-Piñero, J., & Ramírez-Vélez, R. (2021). Youth leisure-time sedentary behavior questionnaire (Ylsbq): Reliability and validity in colombian university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157895

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free