Governance of risk management programs: Learning from Québec’s Farm Income Stabilization Insurance program

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Involving stakeholders in program decision-making can support existing programs and reduce tensions against the state. However, to be involved, stakeholders may request specific mechanisms to influence program design or outcomes. This paper analyzes the design of four consultation mechanisms and the resultant stakeholder experiences in a provincial Canadian program called Farm Income Stabilization Insurance (FISI). The program offers a protection against low prices. The findings of this paper are based on 18 semi-structured interviews conducted with current and former participants familiar with the mechanisms. An analysis is accomplished through Arnstein’s ladder of citizen participation and Glasser’s choice theory. Results show that stakeholder representation can be improved by adequately designing consultation mechanisms and implementing specific actions. Recommended practices include separating political and technical discussions, asking a third party to take charge of the consultation mechanisms and prepare information, formally laying down recurrent mechanisms, and involving high-ranking individuals in the discussions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clerson, F. (2022). Governance of risk management programs: Learning from Québec’s Farm Income Stabilization Insurance program. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 11(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2022.112.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free