Patient-Report-Outcome-Measure and Incentives for Inpatient Chronic Care in Germany

  • Romeyke T
  • Noehammer E
  • Stummer H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In general, incentive tools like pay for performance (P4P) have positive effects regarding treatment quality and financial outcomes. As they are applicable to the clinical management of chronic conditions like asthma and diabetes, this article analyses their potential for multimodal complex treatment of chronic rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Cost data for chronic rheumatic diseases with and without specified complex treatments and their respective remuneration are compared to permit specific statements regarding incentive aspects in a DRG setting. Moreover, several standardized Patient-Report-Outcome-Measures (PROMs) are considered in the context of complex treatment to allow not only for efficiency, but also effectiveness evaluation. RESULTS: In total, 375 patients with complex treatment for rheumatic conditions were surveyed from 2013 to 2018. The incentive is slightly below (4,821.05 €) the costs incurred for complex treatments (4,972.44 €). The results of the used PROMs are positive as pain intensity decreased considerably (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Romeyke, T., Noehammer, E., & Stummer, H. (2020). Patient-Report-Outcome-Measure and Incentives for Inpatient Chronic Care in Germany. Global Journal of Health Science, 12(8), 127. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v12n8p127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free