Obesity reduction within a generation: The dual roles of prevention and treatment

7Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2010, the White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity provided benchmark goals for reducing childhood obesity. We evaluated the balance of prevention and treatment required for achieving Task Force goals in benchmark years 2015, 2020, and 2030. We created a simulation of US birth cohorts (2-19 years) born 2008-2030. For each year, we assumed old birth cohorts (part of previous benchmark obesity estimates) would benefit from obesity treatment strategies, and new birth cohorts would benefit from obesity prevention strategies. We assessed obesity prevalence that must be achieved through prevention strategies, under varying assumptions of treatment effectiveness. When we assumed a 1% absolute reduction in prevalence through treatment, we found that prevention strategies would need to achieve an obesity prevalence of 12% by 2015, 8% by 2020, and 0.3% by 2030. Because of higher obesity prevalence among minority children, prevention strategies would need to achieve a negative prevalence by 2030, which is implausible. Under more generous assumptions of treatment effectiveness, estimates became positive but remained low. Task Force goals are more difficult to achieve with each benchmark year. Policies must focus on obesity treatment interventions, particularly targeted to racial/ethnic minority children, to make progress in stemming the epidemic. © 2011 The Obesity Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J. M., & Lee, H. (2011). Obesity reduction within a generation: The dual roles of prevention and treatment. Obesity, 19(10), 2107–2110. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free