Screening prevalence and incidence of colorectal cancer among American Indian/Alaskan natives in the Indian Health Service

26Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Studies on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and incidence among American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) are few. Aims: Our aim was to determine CRC screening prevalence and to calculate CRC incidence among AI/AN receiving care within the Indian Health Service (IHS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of AI/AN who utilized IHS from 1996 to 2004. AI/AN who were average-risk for CRC and received primary care within IHS were identified by searching the IHS Resource Patient Management System for selected ICD-9/CPT codes (n = 142,051). CRC screening prevalence was calculated and predictors of screening were determined for this group. CRC incidence rates were ascertained for the entire AI/AN population ages 50-80 who received IHS medical care between 1996 and 2004 (n = 283,717). Results: CRC screening was performed in 4.0% of average-risk AI/AN. CRC screening was more common among women than men (RR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.7) and among AI/AN living in the Alaska region compared to the Pacific Coast region (RR = 2.5, 95% CI 2.2-2.8) while patients living in the Northern Plains (RR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.4) were less likely to have been screened. CRC screening was less common among patients with a greater number of primary care visits. The age-adjusted CRC incidence among AI/AN ages 50-80 was 227 cancers per 100,000 person-years. Conclusions: CRC was common among AI/AN receiving medical care within IHS. However, CRC screening prevalence was far lower than has been reported for the U.S. population. © 2011 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Day, L. W., Espey, D. K., Madden, E., Segal, M., & Terdiman, J. P. (2011). Screening prevalence and incidence of colorectal cancer among American Indian/Alaskan natives in the Indian Health Service. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 56(7), 2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1528-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free