Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: Comparison with thermodilution

43Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since its introduction by Kubicek and colleagues, impedance cardiography has been suggested as a non-invasive, simple, safe and cost-effective method of measuring stroke volume. Several controversial reports on its validity have been published. Pitfalls of this method included the nature of the electrode system and the validity of the equations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare two different spot electrode arrays and the two most frequently used stroke volume equations with each other and with thermodilution. In 37 patients, 24-36 h after cardiac surgery, we performed simultaneous measurements of stroke volume with impedance cardiography (SV(IC)) and with thermodilution (SV(TD)) SV(IC) was obtained using the lateral spot (LS) electrode array, according to Bernstein, and a newly proposed modified semi-circular (MSC) spot electrode array. The equations of Kubicek and Sramek-Bernstein were used to calculate SV(IC). The Sramek-Bernstein equation was valid only when the LS array was used; the Kubicek equation determined SV(TD) Correctly only when the MSC array was used. However, a considerably better correlation and agreement (mean difference (2 SD)) was found between SV(IC) and SV(TD) for the latter (r = 0.90, 0.5 (17.1) ml vs r = 0.64, -4.9 (31.8) ml for the Sramek-Bernstein equation). We conclude that the most valid measurement of stroke volume using impedance cardiography was obtained when the MSC array was used together with Kubicek's equation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woltjer, H. H., Bogaard, H. J., Scheffer, G. J., Van der Spoel, H. I., Huybregts, M. A. J. M., & De Vries, P. M. J. M. (1996). Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: Comparison with thermodilution. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 77(6), 748–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/77.6.748

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free