Sistemas de ingeniería: problemas, modelos y algoritmos de solución para la ayuda en la toma de decisiones

  • Candia-Véjar A
  • González M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Scientific and technical development has led both to an increase in the complexity of Engineering Systems and the definition of new problems associated to this area. These advances have led scientists to deal with problems related to decision making, which are very difficult to solve. As a consequence, new sofisticated and effective methodologies are emerging in order to face these problems. Some traditionally problematic areas in the field of Engineering Systems are: Logistics and Transport, Generation and Distribution of Electrical Power and Services Location (Health, Education, Logistics, etc.). New problems have emerged in these areas as well as in other new areas, such as Bioinformatics and Communication Networks. Both new and traditional areas share the ability to address decision-making models increasing in complexity, given the development and economic growth, the scientific and technological progress as well as the global economic and political instability. Difficult problems can be found in several of the components of Engineering Systems. A traditional component associated with the difficulty of the problems is their computational complexity. As an example, in a plant location related problem, which is an inexhaustible source of difficult problems, a polynomial time algorithm to solve the problem is often not known (and it is not expected that such algorithm exists). Therefore, the design of approximate or heuristic algorithms, able to deliver good solutions in reasonable time, is crucial when the problem to solve is complicated. Another source of difficulty is due to the uncertainty associated with a system. Although there are simple systems showing no uncertainty in their different components, real-world systems are always affected by uncertainty. In fact, uncertainty is present in most or all of the real-world elements. In some cases, uncertainty can be modeled by means of probabilities. Stochastic Programming is the area that provides the theory and techniques to address problems of this type. Another alternative is called Fuzzy Optimization, where uncertainty is modeled using the concepts of fuzzy sets. A more recent alternative is Robust Optimization, in which the objective is usually to optimize an objective function that belongs to the worst case. Whatever the mathematical model used, the resulting model containing uncertainty is more complex than the corresponding classical one. A last source of difficulty which is important to mention is optimization problems intrinsically consider two or more objective functions. For example, cost minimization of constructing several plants for an industry in expansion and, at the same time, the achievement of the minimization of the environmental impact produced by the construction and operation of these plants. The mathematical models of Multicriteria Optimization and Multiobjective Optimization have been developed in order to solve these challenging problems. Regarding the problem-solving methodologies associated with Engineering Systems, an important set of techniques, algorithms and programs are available nowadays. In particular, the model of Linear Programming and both the Simplex and Interior Point algorithms, the Integer Linear Programming model and both Branch and Bound and Branch and Cut algorithms. All these models and algorithms have been responsible for the solution of important real-world optimization problems for over 50 years. However, the increasing complexity of problems arising from Engineering Systems, with the inherent complexity of the problems, has led to the development of a new class of algorithms called Metaheuristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Candia-Véjar, A., & González, M. (2011). Sistemas de ingeniería: problemas, modelos y algoritmos de solución para la ayuda en la toma de decisiones. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 19(3), 310–311. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33052011000300001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free