One- vs two-burr-hole technique for combined endoscopic third ventriculostomy and pineal region biopsy: Volumetric analysis of brain at risk

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pineal region tumors are associated with the ventricular system. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is often performed at the same time as tumor biopsy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the volume of brain possibly undergoing injury and forniceal stretching during ETV and tumor biopsy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of preoperative magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) and computed tomography (CTs) of patients with pineal region masses and used volumetric image-guided navigation to simulate a 1-burr-hole vs a 2-burr-hole approach through the brain parenchyma. We compared the volumes of parenchyma and fornix at the risk of injury. RESULTS: The ideal entry point for ETV using 2 burr holes was a mean±standard deviation (SD) of 25.8±6mmfromthe midline and 11.4±9mmbehind the coronal suture. The ideal entry point using 2 burr holes for tumor biopsy was 25.7 ±8 mm from the midline and 53.7 ±14 mm anterior to the coronal suture. With 1 burr hole, the mean ±SD volume of brain parenchyma at riskwas 852±440mm3. The volume of brain parenchyma at riskwith 2 burr holes was 2159±474mm3 (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liebelt, B. D., Chen, F., Biroli, A., Zhao, X., & Nakaji, P. (2020). One- vs two-burr-hole technique for combined endoscopic third ventriculostomy and pineal region biopsy: Volumetric analysis of brain at risk. Operative Neurosurgery, 19(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free