Comparison of Regularized Regression Methods for ~Omics Data

  • Acharjee A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000126 metabolites. Therefore, we considered potato tuber flesh colour as the phenotypic trait of interest, the response in our regression and a large metabolomics data set as the set of predictor variables. For tuber flesh colour, there is a well-established relationship to the carotenoid pathway, and especially to beta caroteen [10], therefore, compounds related to this pathway are expected to be observed in a top list or selected set of predictive variables. We apply a double cross validation scheme to include optimization of any hyperparameters needed in the models and allow estimation of prediction error. We apply different regression methods: ridge regression (RR) [11], LASSO [12], elastic net (EN) [13], principal component regression (PCR) [14], partial least squares regression (PLS) [15], sparse PLS regression (SPLS) [16], support vector regression (SVR) [17] and random forest regression (RF) [18]. We use univariate regression as a reference and compare the results of univariate regressions with multiple regression methods. We also study the properties of these methods both from a theoretical point of view, as well as their performance in practical situations in terms

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acharjee, A. (2012). Comparison of Regularized Regression Methods for ~Omics Data. Journal of Postgenomics Drug & Biomarker Development, 03(03). https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-0769.1000126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free