A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass Surgery

  • King S
  • Lembo N
  • Weintraub W
  • et al.
704Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The clinical benefit of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease has not been established. To determine the outcomes of these treatments in patients referred for the first time for coronary revascularization, we conducted a three-year prospective, randomized trial comparing the two procedures. Methods Revascularization was performed by accepted methods. Follow-up clinical information was collected every six months, and coronary arteriography and thallium stress scanning were performed at one and three years. The primary end point was a composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and a large ischemic defect identified on thallium scanning at three years. Secondary end points included clinical and angiographic status and the need for additional revascularization procedures. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Of the 5118 patients sc...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, S. B., Lembo, N. J., Weintraub, W. S., Kosinski, A. S., Barnhart, H. X., Kutner, M. H., … Zhao, X.-Q. (1994). A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(16), 1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199410203311602

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free