Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Algae Removal Technology and Its Development Status

66Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, the frequent outbreaks of cyanobacterial blooms have caused severe water pollution in many rivers and lakes at home and abroad, endangering drinking water safety and human health. How to remove cyanobacteria from water bodies safely, quickly, and economically has attracted the attention of many scientists. Currently, the typical treatment methods for algae in algae-bearing water bodies are physical, biological, and chemical methods. The physical method of algae removal is for both the symptoms and the root cause, but the workload is extensive, with high input costs, and should not be used on a large scale. The biological method is low-cost, but the removal efficiency is slow and unsuitable for the treatment of sudden water bloom. The chemical method can kill algae quickly, but it is easy to cause secondary pollution. These methods are relatively independent of each other, so the choice of a practical combination of technologies is essential for algal bloom removal and eutrophication management. This paper reviews the current application status and advantages and disadvantages of algae removal technologies at home and abroad; classifies them from physical, chemical, biological, and combined methods; and provides an outlook on the future development direction of algae removal technologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeng, G., Zhang, R., Liang, D., Wang, F., Han, Y., Luo, Y., … Sun, D. (2023, March 1). Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Algae Removal Technology and Its Development Status. Water (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free