Anatomy of a Successful Grant Proposal

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The mechanics of writing a research proposal are addressed elsewhere in this text (see Chap. 33). In this chapter we will address the factors that are relevant to the successful funding of a grant proposal. The scientific basis of a research proposal is paramount, but other factors, often termed ‘grantsmanship’, influence reviewers’ perceptions and evaluations of a research proposal. This chapter uses the example of a United States based federal grant application, but this information is applicable to a variety of funding mechanisms. The authors of this chapter have been successfully funded and served as grant reviewers for governmental agencies, private foundations and international agencies. The information presented here will assist the applicant in understanding the mechanics of grant review from the reviewer’s perspective as well as methods to create enthusiasm for the application in the reviewers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernandez, R., Perry, S. J., & Patterson, M. D. (2019). Anatomy of a Successful Grant Proposal. In Healthcare Simulation Research: A Practical Guide (pp. 277–284). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free