Trial by YouTube: effects of expert psychiatric witness testimony on viewers' opinions of Amber Heard and Johnny Depp

  • Mason O
  • Horton B
  • Starrett C
0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and methodWe aimed to assess whether viewing expert witness evidence regarding the mental health of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in the 2022 court case in the USA would affect viewers’ attitudes towards the mental health of the two protagonists and towards mental illness in general. After viewing excerpts of the cross-examination evidence, 38 trial-naive undergraduate students completed the Prejudice towards People with a Mental Illness (PPMI) scale.ResultsFollowing viewing, participants held more stigmatising views of the protagonists than they held about mental disorders in general.Clinical implicationsIt is plausible that mass media trial coverage further stigmatises mental illness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mason, O., Horton, B., & Starrett, C. (2025). Trial by YouTube: effects of expert psychiatric witness testimony on viewers’ opinions of Amber Heard and Johnny Depp. BJPsych Bulletin, 49(1), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free