Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods

24Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The consequence of each cesarean section is the uterine scar formation. In some patients, uterine scar after cesarean sec-tion heals incompletely and as a result, the uterine niche is formed. Most of the small niches are asymptomatic, but the large cesarean scar niches in nonpregnant women may cause a cesarean scar syndrome, which manifest itself as abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea and secondary infertility. Among pregnant women, the presence of large niches may be associated with potentially life-threatening consequences, such as cesarean scar dehiscence and uterine rupture, placenta accreta spectrum disorders, placenta previa, cesarean scar pregnancy. Due to the possibility of dangerous consequences related to the occurrence of a uterine niche, in recent years many studies have focused on the term of cesarean scar niche, its risk factors, diagnostic methods and treatment options. Uterine niche can be examined using two or three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography, as well as two and three-dimensional sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography, hysteros-copy or magnetic resonance imaging. However, neither of the above diagnostic method is considered as the “gold standard”. There are no unambiguous guidelines on some aspect concerning the diagnosis of cesarean scar niche. The aim of this study is to analyze and describe the diagnostic methods of cesarean section niche.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budny-Winska, J., & Pomorski, M. (2021). Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods. Ginekologia Polska, 92(10), 726–730. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0195

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free