Abstract
This is a critical analysis of the first part of Gödel's 1951 Gibbs lecture on certain philosophical consequences of the incompleteness theorems. Gödel's discussion is framed in terms of a distinction between objective mathematics and subjective mathematics, according to which the former consists of the truths of mathematics in an absolute sense, and the latter consists of all humanly demonstrable truths. The question is whether these coincide; if they do, no formal axiomatic system (or Turing machine) can comprehend the mathematizing potentialities of human thought, and, if not, there are absolutely unsolvable mathematical problems of diophantine form. © 2006 Oxford University Press.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Feferman, S. (2006). Are there absolutely unsolvable problems? Gödel’s Dichotomy. Philosophia Mathematica, 14(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkj003
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.