The need to discontinue the use of the term "accident" when referring to unintentional injury events

43Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Inconsistencies in the common usage of the words "accident" and "injury" are examined. The practical difficulties in applying some commonly accepted definitions are illustrated. It is shown how common notions of "accident" are not supported by the facts and are counterproductive to preventive measures. It is argued that the phrase "injury control" provides a more comprehensive perspective of the problem than the phrase "accident prevention", but its use also has disadvantages. It is concluded that health professionals should discontinue using the term "accident" and associated phrases, when referring to unintentional injury events. © 1988.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Langley, J. D. (1988). The need to discontinue the use of the term “accident” when referring to unintentional injury events. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(88)90009-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free