Including non-English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low-cost sources of translation support

15Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-English language (NEL) articles are commonly excluded from published systematic reviews. The high cost associated with professional translation services and associated time commitment are often cited as barriers. Whilst there is debate as to the impact of excluding such articles from systematic reviews, doing so can introduce various biases. In order to encourage researchers to consider including these articles in future reviews, this paper aims to reflect on the experience and process of conducting a systematic review which included NEL articles. It provides an overview of the different approaches used to identify sources of low-cost translation support and considers the relative merits of, among others, seeking support through universities, social media, word-of-mouth, and use of personal contacts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rockliffe, L. (2022). Including non-English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low-cost sources of translation support. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free