Analyzing the composite 3-D printer frame for rigidity

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing offers a wide variety of options when it comes to the construction of a part. Different infill patterns, infill densities, varying shell thickness, and different materials all have different effects on the final strength of a functional 3D printed part. This paper studies the benefits of using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) process to print a part completely hollow and fill the completed hollow shell with epoxy resin to create a solid component. FDM is also known as fused filament fabrication (FFF). Often times, large functional FDM parts can take quite a long time to complete printing due to high strength setting requirements. Hollow parts can print much faster than parts with infill, then be filled with an epoxy resin to create a solid part in much less time. When cured, the resin filled components will produce a stronger and more rigid finished product than a printing the part with comparable print settings. To illustrate this, a 3D printer frame was designed, analyzed with an FEM simulation and fabricated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holman, J. M., & Serdar, T. (2018). Analyzing the composite 3-D printer frame for rigidity. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2018-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29803

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free