A Comparison of Seitz and Millipore Membrane Filters for the Enumeration of Fecal Coliforms

0Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a comparison of two commonly used membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria it was demonstrated that Seitz type M filters recovered statistically more colonies of bacteria than did Millipore HAWG 047S1 filters from pure cultures of Escherichia coli incubated at 44 °C. The membranes were grown on 0.4 % Teepol agar. On incubation at 37°C no significant discrepancy was found. As a reference method was used pour plating in plate count agar (Difco). It was demonstrated that incubation at 44°C did not per se inhibit propagation of fecal coliforms. Both types of filters examined were sterilized by the manufacturers with ethylene oxide. The discrepancy found can therefore not be due to sterilization procedures.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Søgaard, H. (1976). A Comparison of Seitz and Millipore Membrane Filters for the Enumeration of Fecal Coliforms. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 17(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547940

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free