Abstract
Projective identification is an expression on which there is no consensus, yet. To some investigators (Kernberg 1979, Volkan 1978) it means a defensive mechanism, to some (Konig K. Lindler V. 1991) it presents a from of relationship, to some (Canhdan 1988) it is a determining mechanism which disturbs relationships and to others (Porder 1987) it is a normal phenomenon. Despite the high number of publications on that subject it is remarkable that two main points which have formed the title for the subject, namely 'projection' and 'identification' have been neglected. It is also remarkable that investigators have not paid attention to the two subjects are related each other, 'splitting'. A further reason which hinders a consensus in the variety of meanings given to 'projective identification' the fact that it is not regarded as being bound to psychic disturbances. Within this work, 'projective identification' will be presented as a defensive mechanism for patients who show ego-defects like borderline or psychoses. Two main parts, namely 'projection' and 'identification' and the difference of their mechanism to phenomena within the psychotherapy of classical neuroses will be pointed out. In this work, I believe that this way of approaching the subject is a way which could lead to a consensus on subject.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Odag, C. (1994). Projective identification. Noropsikiyatri Arsivi, 31(3), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216436713.ch-022
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.