Applications of nonconventional green extraction technologies in process industries: Challenges, limitations and perspectives

89Citations
Citations of this article
239Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study reviewed five different nonconventional technologies which are aligned with green concepts of product recovery from raw materials on industrial scale, with minimal energy consumption and chemical use. Namely, this study reviewed supercritical fluid extraction (SCFE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound extraction (UAE) and pulsed electric fields extraction (PEFE). This paper provides an overview of relevant innovative work done in process industries on different plant matrices for functional value-added compounds and byproduct production. A comparison of the five extraction methods showed the supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2) process to be more reliable despite some limitations and challenges in terms of extraction yield and solubility of some bioactive compounds when applied in processing industries. However, these challenges can be solved by using ionic liquids as a trainer or cosolvent to supercritical CO2 during the extraction process. The choice of ionic liquid over organic solvents used to enhance extraction yield and solubility is based on properties such as hydrophobicity, polarity and selectivity in addition to a safe environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fomo, G., Madzimbamuto, T. N., & Ojumu, T. V. (2020, July 1). Applications of nonconventional green extraction technologies in process industries: Challenges, limitations and perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free