Abstract
Long-distance (or 'transparent') vowel harmony systems have frequently been con-sidered 'unnatural' and analysed as 'crazy rules' (Bach and Harms, 1972) because they violate the principle of strict locality. Articulatory explanations for the phonetic grounding of vowel harmony are unable to extend to non-local processes, and attempts to re-analyse cases of transparent harmony as strictly local have been largely unsuccess-ful. In this paper, I present experimental evidence suggesting that vowel harmony may be perceptually (as well as articulatorily) grounded, and that this source of phonetic grounding does in fact extend to long-distance as well as local harmony. In a series of four experiments, subjects were presented with a nonsense word followed by an isolated vowel, and asked to report whether the isolated vowel had occurred in the preceding word. Subjects were consistently faster and more accurate in nonsense words which exhibited vowel harmony along the relevant feature dimension, regardless of locality. A fourth experiment included a task requiring subjects to identify whether the vowel occurred in a specific syllable, and here too they showed better performance on items with vowel harmony along the relevant feature dimension. I argue that strict locality is * This work has benefited greatly from fruitful discussions with
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kimper, W. (2017). Not crazy after all these years? Perceptual grounding for long-distance vowel harmony. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.47
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.