The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: Conceptual challenges for crime science

13Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A recent disciplinary offshoot of criminology, crime science (CS) defines itself as"the application of science to the control of crime." One of its stated ambitions is to act as a cross-disciplinary linchpin in the domain of crime reduction. Despite many practical successes, notably in the area of situational crime prevention (SCP), CS has yet to achieve a commensurate level of academic visibility. The case is made that the growth of CS is stifled by its reliance on a model of decision-making, the Rational Choice Perspective (RCP), which is inimical to the integration of knowledge and insights from the behavioral, cognitive and neurosciences (CBNs). Examples of salient developments in the CBNs are provided, as regards notably multiple-system perspectives of decision-making and approaches to person-environment interaction. Short and long-term benefits of integration for CS are briefly outlined. © 2013 Bouhana.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouhana, N. (2013). The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: Conceptual challenges for crime science. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00682

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free