Abstract
Background: Frailty phenotype and deficit-accumulation frailty index (FI) are widely used measures of frailty. Their performance in predicting recovery after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been compared. Methods: Patients undergoing SAVR (n = 91) or TAVR (n = 137) at an academic medical center were prospectively assessed for frailty phenotype and FI. Outcomes were death or poor recovery, defined as a decline in ability to perform 22 daily activities and New York Heart Association class 3 or 4 at 6 months after surgery. The predictive ability of frailty phenotype versus FI and their additive value to a traditional surgical risk model were evaluated using C-statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement. Results: TAVR patients had higher prevalence of phenotypic frailty (85% vs 38%, p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shi, S., Afilalo, J., Lipsitz, L. A., Popma, J. J., Khabbaz, K. R., Laham, R. J., … Kim, D. H. (2019). Frailty phenotype and deficit accumulation frailty index in predicting recovery after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 74(8), 1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly196
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.