Utilization of Cryopreserved Oocytes in Patients with Poor Ovarian Response after Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation may impact patients' desire or need to utilize cryopreserved oocytes for family building in the future. These findings, captured by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) national data, underscore the need for tailored counseling and further research into the decision-making processes influencing oocyte utilization. Objective: To examine the association of ovarian response to stimulation and the number of vitrified oocytes with the likelihood and timing of patients returning for oocyte utilization following planned oocyte cryopreservation (OC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data in the SART Clinical Outcome Reporting System for patients in US fertility clinics and data was used for eligible patients who underwent planned OC from January 2014 through December 2020. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to June 2023. Main outcomes and measures: The association between number of oocytes cryopreserved on return rate to utilize cryopreserved oocytes and the time from vitrification to warming. Results: A total of 67893 autologous oocyte freezing cycles were performed in the US between 2014 and 2020, among 47363 patients (mean [SD] age, 34.5 [4.7] years). Of these, 6421 (13.5%) were classified as patients with POR, with fewer than 5 oocytes vitrified across all ovarian stimulation cycles. A total of 1203 patients (2.5%) returned for oocyte warming and utilization. The rate of return was significantly higher in the POR group, with 260 (4.0%) returning compared with 943 (2.3%) in the normal responder group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fouks, Y., Sakkas, D., Bortoletto, P. E., Penzias, A. S., Seidler, E. A., & Vaughan, D. A. (2024). Utilization of Cryopreserved Oocytes in Patients with Poor Ovarian Response after Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation. JAMA Network Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49722

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free