Abstract
This article argues that the dovetailing economic, geopolitical, and security interests that underpin the Belt and Road Initiative demands a dispute resolution mechanism that focuses on broader interests and legal rights. Using the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a case study, it identifies the conditions in which Chinese investors could have initiated an investment arbitration but did not. This can be explained by the rights-based orientation of investment treaties failing to reflect the interests of multi-project initiatives. Instead, alternative methods of home state intervention, such as state-funded political risk insurance, are used to protect investors. In other words, the political economy of CPEC investments refuses to utilize hard law mechanisms. Given this context, mediation may be a viable alternative. These circumstances accelerate the trend towards de-legalization, which is often cited as an inevitable consequence of the emerging geoeconomic order but suggests that reasons other than national security are the cause.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McLaughlin, M. (2024). The Geoeconomics of Belt and Road Disputes: A Case Study on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Asian Journal of International Law, 14(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000176
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.