Abstract
Sound masking can diminish the performance impairment due to background speech in open-plan offices. This paper compares a steady-state masking sound with the spectrum of the disturbing speech signal to a time-reversed speech masker. As part of a laboratory experiment subjects have to complete a digit span task and a questionnaire. Both masking sounds improve the number recall performance as compared to unmasked speech. When the speech-to-noise ratio is reduced, the error rates decrease only during stationary sound masking. Sound masking with time-reversed speech increases the speech privacy at higher speech-to-noise ratios but it is perceived as more annoying.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Renz, T., Leistner, P., & Liebl, A. (2018). Auditory distraction by speech: Comparison of fluctuating and steady speech-like masking sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), EL83–EL88. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5048637
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.