Auditory distraction by speech: Comparison of fluctuating and steady speech-like masking sounds

  • Renz T
  • Leistner P
  • Liebl A
9Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sound masking can diminish the performance impairment due to background speech in open-plan offices. This paper compares a steady-state masking sound with the spectrum of the disturbing speech signal to a time-reversed speech masker. As part of a laboratory experiment subjects have to complete a digit span task and a questionnaire. Both masking sounds improve the number recall performance as compared to unmasked speech. When the speech-to-noise ratio is reduced, the error rates decrease only during stationary sound masking. Sound masking with time-reversed speech increases the speech privacy at higher speech-to-noise ratios but it is perceived as more annoying.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Renz, T., Leistner, P., & Liebl, A. (2018). Auditory distraction by speech: Comparison of fluctuating and steady speech-like masking sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), EL83–EL88. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5048637

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free