The Modern Periphery-Making Machine in the Early Twenty-First Century

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cultural, discursive, and technological differences notwithstanding, the peripheralization effects of plantation agriculture-based development pathways seem to be as vibrant today as during the height of the modern era's imperialism. This, at least, is what Bosma suggests, and I fully agree with him. The plantation, that modern labour-expelling periphery-making machine, is alive and kicking hard amid convergent socioecological crises nowadays. And this is an analytically but also politically salient phenomenon. Most often, development models which rely on predatory extractivism not only leave the majority of the population behind the well-being bandwagon, thereby turning a deaf ear to the pledge of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to leave no one behind; they also erode the ecological base, socioeconomic fabric, and institutions that enable more just and environmentally sound life projects to blossom. Thus, the careful examination of the complex and generative interplay between the model and intensity of resource extractivism and the broader political economy, as developed by Bosma in The Making of a Periphery, calls into question any non-transformative climate stewardship and sustainable development efforts, like the business as usual one represented by the flex crops and commodities complexes of the twenty-first century.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alonso-Fradejas, A. (2020, December 1). The Modern Periphery-Making Machine in the Early Twenty-First Century. International Review of Social History. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859020000590

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free