Comparison of changes in refractive error and corneal curvature following small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery

13Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual acuity, refractive error, corneal curvature, and the stability of these parameters during the early postoperative period following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery. Methods: One hundred and five eyes and 110 eyes were enrolled in SMILE and FS-LASIK group, respectively. Uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UCVA and BCVA), manifest refraction, corneal curvature, intraocular pressure, and slit-lamp examinations were performed preoperatively, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Results: No significant differences in postoperative UCVA or BCVA were observed between the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups at any time point. SMILE group had significant better postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) values than FS-LASIK group at 1 day, 1 week, and 1-month follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in postoperative SE values at 3-month follow-up. Significant differences in mean postoperative corneal curvature were observed during all follow-up examinations. Conclusion: SMILE surgery was associated with more accurate postoperative refractive correction up to 1 month following surgery. SMILE surgery also resulted in less significant corneal curvature changes than FS-LASIK. Furthermore, FS-LASIK was associated with decreased stability of postoperative refractive error and corneal curvature relative to SMILE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Y., Cao, L., Chen, H., Xu, X., Li, Z., & Liu, L. (2018). Comparison of changes in refractive error and corneal curvature following small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 66(11), 1562–1567. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_366_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free