The victims, villains and heroes of ‘panic buying’: News media attribution of responsibility for COVID-19 stockpiling

15Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Societies often respond to a crisis by attributing blame to some groups while constructing others as victims and heroes. While it has received scant sociological attention, ‘panic buying’ is a critical indicator of such public sentiment at the onset of a crisis, and thus a crucial site for analysis. This article traces dynamics of blame in news media representations of an extreme period of panic buying during COVID-19 in Australia. Analysis reveals that lower socio-economic and ethnically diverse consumers were blamed disproportionately. Unlike wealthier consumers who bulk-bought online, shoppers filling trollies in-store were depicted as selfish and shameful, described using dehumanising language, and portrayed as ‘villains’ who threatened social order. Supermarkets were cast simultaneously as ‘victims’ of consumer aggression and ‘heroes’ for their moral leadership, trustworthiness and problem-solving. This portrayal misunderstands the socio-emotional drivers of panic buying, exacerbates stigma towards already disadvantaged groups, and veils the corporate profiteering that encourages stockpiling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillips, T., Vargas, C., Graham, M., Couch, D., & Gleeson, D. (2023). The victims, villains and heroes of ‘panic buying’: News media attribution of responsibility for COVID-19 stockpiling. Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833211057310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free