SPINAL OR GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR SURGERY OF THE FRACTURED HIP?

  • VALENTIN N
  • LOMHOLT B
  • JENSEN J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The mortality following surgical correction of upper femoral fractures was investigated in 578 patients, over the age of 50 yr, randomly allocated to receive spinal (bupivacaine) or general (enflurane or neurolept) anaesthesia. Thirty days after surgery the mortality was 6% after spinal and 8% after general anaesthesia (ns). Six months to 2 years after surgery the mortality was identical in the two groups. There were no differences with respect to ambulation and discharge. The estimated blood loss was smaller (P < 0.05) in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia. Regardless of the anaesthetic technique, a high short-term mortality was related to age, male sex, and trochanteric fracture, whereas excess long-term mortality was related to male sex and high ASA scores. © 1986 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

VALENTIN, N., LOMHOLT, B., JENSEN, J. S., HEJGAARD, N., & KREINER, S. (1986). SPINAL OR GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR SURGERY OF THE FRACTURED HIP? British Journal of Anaesthesia, 58(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/58.3.284

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free