Topical lidocaine reduces the risk of perioperative airway complications in children with upper respiratory tract infections

29Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of topically applied lidocaine on perioperative airway complications when using a laryngeal mask airway device (LMAD) in children either with or without a history of recent or ongoing upper respiratory tract infection (URI). Methods: In a randomized controlled double-blind trial, 34 children with a history of recent or ongoing URI and 32 non-URI children- all of whom were younger than age ten and scheduled to undergo minor surgical procedures-were randomly assigned to either a lidocaine or a placebo group. In the lidocaine group, an LMAD was lubricated with lidocaine gel before insertion, and a clear lubricating gel was used in the placebo group. The following data were recorded after standardized anesthesia induction and airway management: postoperative complications, such as coughing, desaturation, laryngospasm, and increased oral secretions, as well as length of stay in the postanesthetic recovery unit. Results: Children with URI had a lower overall perioperative complication rate if they received a lidocaine gel (35%) rather than placebo (94%) (P < 0.01). Also, the incidence of postoperative coughing was less (12% vs 53%; P = 0.03). In non-URI patients, lidocaine did not significantly reduce the rate of airway complications compared with placebo (17% vs 24%, respectively). Conclusion: Lubrication of the LMAD with lidocaine gel reduces the incidence of airway complications in children with an upper respiratory tract infection. © 2010 Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schebesta, K., Güloglu, E., Chiari, A., Mayer, N., & Kimberger, O. (2010). Topical lidocaine reduces the risk of perioperative airway complications in children with upper respiratory tract infections. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 57(8), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9328-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free