On uneven internationalisation, disciplinary diversity and interpretation of co-citation analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this rejoinder for this special issue, we enter into dialogue with the various commentaries that our article "Between Fragmentation and Institutionalisation" received. In doing so, we address some of the commonly-identified limitations of our paper and clarify the interpretation of some of our findings. This includes key issues such as the uneven internationalisation of migration studies, the need to reveal a broader variety of disciplinary contributions to the field, and the need for some further clarification of the results of the co-citation analysis and caveats of its interpretation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pisarevskaya, A., Levy, N., & Scholten, P. (2020, December 1). On uneven internationalisation, disciplinary diversity and interpretation of co-citation analysis. Comparative Migration Studies. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00197-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free