Incomplete punishment networks in public goods games: experimental evidence

27Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abundant evidence suggests that high levels of contributions to public goods can be sustained through self-governed monitoring and sanctioning. This experimental study investigates the effectiveness of decentralized sanctioning institutions in alternative punishment networks. Our results show that the structure of punishment network significantly affects allocations to the public good. In addition, we observe that network configurations are more important than punishment capacities for the levels of public good provision, imposed sanctions and economic efficiency. Lastly, we show that targeted revenge is a major driver of anti-social punishment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leibbrandt, A., Ramalingam, A., Sääksvuori, L., & Walker, J. M. (2015). Incomplete punishment networks in public goods games: experimental evidence. Experimental Economics, 18(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9402-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free