Quality of Rivers: Comparison of Hydro-Morphological, Physical-Chemical and Biological Methods

13Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study was performed in five fourth-order tributaries of the Bystrzyca Lubelska River (Eastern Poland, Lublin Upland), differing in the degree of river-bed transformation and level of pollution. Hydro-morphological methods (descriptive method by Ilnicki and Lewandowski - IL, and index method by Oglecki and Pawlat - OP) and biological indices based on the composition of zoobenthos (Diversity - D, and index based on proportions between the density of Oligochaeta and Chironomidae - O/Ch) permitted distinguishing of four classes, from II to V. The distinguishing of only two quality classes (III and IV) was possible by means of physical-chemical methods and by benthic index BMWP-PL. Those two methods seem to show the lowest sensitivity to the spatial variability of the environment quality. The BMWP-PL index was the least sensitive to year-to-year environmental changes, and O/Ch was the most sensitive. Relatively high conformity was obtained between hydro-morphological assessments performed by means of the OP and IL methods. Results obtained by means of these tools weakly corresponded with the physical-chemical assessments. The latter assessments were the most similar to those obtained by means of the BMWP-PL (degree of similarity = 57%) and D (47%) indices, and considerably less in the case of O/Ch (36%). The BMWP-PL and D indices better corresponded with the results of the hydro-morphological assessment performed by means of the IL method than with those performed by means of the OP method while D index showed a reverse pattern. The O/CH index proved useful for the assessment of the degree of organic pollution of the river's water, but not the sediments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gorzel, M., Kornijów, R., & Buczyńska, E. (2018). Quality of Rivers: Comparison of Hydro-Morphological, Physical-Chemical and Biological Methods. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, 25(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2018-0007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free