Effect of an automatic triggering and cycling system on comfort and patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation

12Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The digital Auto-Trak™ system is a technology capable of automatically adjusting the triggering and cycling mechanisms during pressure support ventilation (PSV). Objective: To compare Auto-Trak with conventional settings in terms of patient-ventilator synchrony and discomfort. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent PSV via the mouth by breathing through an endotracheal tube. In the conventional setting, a pressure support of 8 cm H2O with flow cycling (25% peak inspiratory flow) and a sensitivity of 1 cm H2O was adjusted. In Auto-Trak the triggering and cycling were automatically set. Discomfort, effort of breathing, and the asynchrony index (AI) were assessed. In a complementary bench study, the inspiratory and expiratory time delays were quantified for both settings in three mechanical models: 'normal', obstructive (COPD), and restrictive (ARDS), using the ASL 5000 simulator. Results: In the volunteer study the AI and the discomfort scores did not differ statistically between the two settings. In the bench investigation the use of Auto-Trak was associated with a greater triggering delay in the COPD model and earlier expiratory cycling in the ARDS model but with no asynchronic events. Conclusions: Use of the Auto-Trak system during PSV showed similar results in comparison to the conventional adjustments with respect to patient-ventilator synchrony and discomfort in simulated conditions of invasive mechanical ventilation. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vasconcelos, R. D. S., Melo, L. H. D. P., Sales, R. P., Marinho, L. S., Deulefeu, F. C., Reis, R. C., … Holanda, M. A. (2014). Effect of an automatic triggering and cycling system on comfort and patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation. Respiration, 86(6), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free