Where cost, medical necessity, and morality meet: Should US government insurance programs pay for erectile dysfunction drugs?

16Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Spending for the three most popular phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor drugs to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) tops $1 billion worldwide annually. Using Medicaid and Medicare Part D as examples, we explore here whether US government insurance programs with limited budgets should reimburse for this class of ED drugs and review the common bases for justifying and denying reimbursement. We conclude that the clinical usefulness and costs of such drugs should be the primary drivers of coverage decisions, not moral attitudes toward sexual performance. © 2010 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Polinski, J. M., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2011, January). Where cost, medical necessity, and morality meet: Should US government insurance programs pay for erectile dysfunction drugs? Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free