Prioritization in practice: Insights from the Competition Commission South Africa

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article reports on a research study undertaken to explore the organizational practices and processes that make possible and enable prioritization in the Competition Commission South Africa. Priority-setting, resource marshalling and evaluative organizational processes were found to enable prioritization. Four organizational practices associated with prioritization were identified, each engendering specific organizational values. The practice of managing cases from 'cradle-to-grave' is an approach that encourages ownership of priority cases. The practice of constituting inter-divisional teams promotes joint responsibility and shared accountability among team members. The mid-term review provides an opportunity to calibrate organizational alignment to priorities in a structured and periodic fashion. The practice of encoding priorities in the business plan encourages communication. Furthermore, the analysis highlights how sector expertise, priority setting and project management capabilities associated with prioritization enable the organization to identify and exploit opportunities by reconfiguring its resource base.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burke, M. (2018). Prioritization in practice: Insights from the Competition Commission South Africa. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 6(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jny001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free