The “Relevance” of intersection and union types

25Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate a Curry-Howard interpretation of the intersection and union type inference system for Combinatory Logic. Types are interpreted as formulas of a Hilbert-style logic L, which turns out to be an extension of the intuitionistic logic with respect to provable disjunctive formulas (because of new equivalence relations on formulas), while the implicational-conjunctive fragment of L is still a fragment of intuitionisticlogic. Moreover, typable terms are translated in a typed version, so that ∨-∧-typed combinatory logic terms are proved to completely codify the associated logical proofs. © 1997 by the University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Ghilezan, S., & Venneri, B. (1997). The “Relevance” of intersection and union types. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(2), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039724889

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free