Gender Disparities in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

47Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether there is a gender disparity in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD) at a single health system, and better understand the reasons for this discrepancy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from the University of Miami DBS Database, which included 3251 PD patients, using chi-square, repeated measures ANOVA, and t tests to examine gender differences in the number of patients referred for surgery, reasons for referral, number receiving/not receiving surgery, reasons for not receiving surgery, and postsurgical outcomes. Results: During the study period, 207 PD patients were referred for DBS (75.8% male), and 100 underwent surgery (77.0% male). Of those who did not receive surgery, the most common reasons were need for further medical optimization (26.2%), suboptimal performance on neuropsychological evaluation (22.4%), other reason (20.6%), lost to follow-up (18.7%), or patient preference (12.2%). However, in women one of the most common reasons was patient preference (28.0%), and this was significant compared to men (p < 0.001). Men were more likely to be lost to follow-up (p = 0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in postsurgical outcomes. Conclusions: Despite similar postsurgical improvements, women were less likely to undergo DBS surgery due to their own preference, while men were more likely to be lost to follow-up. These data underscore the need for increased education and awareness of DBS so that all patients with PD who qualify for surgery can benefit from this procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shpiner, D. S., Di Luca, D. G., Cajigas, I., Diaz, J. S., Margolesky, J., Moore, H., … Luca, C. C. (2019). Gender Disparities in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease. Neuromodulation, 22(4), 484–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12973

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free