Threshold of clinical severity of cervical dystonia for positive 18F-FDG PET/CT

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the clinical severity of cervical dystonia (CD) significantly correlates with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) findings as well as to determine the threshold of the clinical severity of CD for positive 18F-FDG PET/CT study findings. Methods: Forty-seven subjects with torticollis as one of the symptoms of CD were included. The clinical severity of CD was evaluated with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) at the time of 18F-FDG PET/CT. The correlation between the clinical severity of CD and the highest SUVmax was examined. The threshold of the clinical severity of CD necessary for positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings was determined using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Results: Thirty-three of the 47 subjects (70.21%) showed positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings. The ipsilateral splenius capitis/cervicis, oblique capitis inferior, and longus colli/capitis were the rotators most frequently involved. The highest SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET/CT was significant correlated with the TWSTRS. Subjects with a total TWSTRS exceeding 39 showed positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings, with those having a total TWSTRS.22 showing negative 18F-FDG PET/CT results. The cutoffvalue of the total TWSTRS for positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings was set at 27.5 with 90.9% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity. Conclusion: A significant correlation was evident between the clinical severity of CD and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings, providing a threshold of the clinical severity of CD for acquisition of positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings. © 2013 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. J., An, Y. S., Ahn, Y. W., & Yim, S. Y. (2013). Threshold of clinical severity of cervical dystonia for positive 18F-FDG PET/CT. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(6), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.777

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free