AI and access to justice: How AI legal advisors can reduce economic and shame-based barriers to justice

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

ChatGPT – a large language model – recently passed the U.S. bar exam. The startling rise and power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT lead us to consider whether and how more specialized systems could be used to overcome existing barriers to the legal system. Such systems could be employed in either of the two major stages of the pursuit of justice: preliminary information gathering and formal engagement with the state’s legal institutions and professionals. We focus on the former and argue that developing and deploying publicly funded AI legal advisors can reduce economic and shame-based cultural barriers to the information-gathering stage of pursuing justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Long, B., & Palmer, A. (2024). AI and access to justice: How AI legal advisors can reduce economic and shame-based barriers to justice. Zeitschrift Fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie Und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 33(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.33.1.21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free