Multi-Method Assessment of Sleep in Children With Angelman Syndrome: A Case–Controlled Study

18Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess sleep quality and timing in children with Angelman syndrome (AS) with sleep problems using questionnaires and actigraphy and contrast sleep parameters to those of typically developing (TD) children matched for age and sex. Methods: Week-long actigraphy assessments were undertaken with children with AS (n = 20) with parent-reported sleep difficulties and compared with age and sex matched TD controls. The presence of severe sleep problems was assessed using the modified Simonds and Parraga sleep questionnaire. Sleep hygiene was measured using the Family Inventory of Sleep Habits. Results: Actigraphy and parent-completed sleep diary data indicated that children with AS had significantly earlier bedtimes (p =.003, Cohen d =.47) and poorer sleep efficiency (78%, p =.04, d =.33) than TD children (84%). No significant differences in total sleep time, sleep onset latency or wake after sleep onset were found between the two groups. The expected relationship between later bedtimes and increasing age found for the TD group (p.05). Conclusions: This study reports the largest objective dataset of sleep quality parameters in children with AS. Sleep quality in this group was characterised by poor efficiency and significant intra- and inter-individual variability that warrants further investigation. This variability should inform assessment and intervention for sleep in children with AS, as averages of total sleep, even across a 7 day period may not capture the difficulties with night waking highlighted by parental questionnaire report.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trickett, J., Oliver, C., Heald, M., Denyer, H., Surtees, A., Clarkson, E., … Richards, C. (2019). Multi-Method Assessment of Sleep in Children With Angelman Syndrome: A Case–Controlled Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free