Which NICS method is most consistent with ring current analysis? Assessment in simple monocycles

63Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aromaticity of benzene, Al42- cluster, cyclopropane, borazine and planar cyclooctatetraene (COT) was analyzed according to different strategies based on nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) computations. The analysis of NICS-components evolution along the main molecular axis seems to be the most adequate and simplest strategy to predict the aromatic or antiaromatic character of the studied systems. Moreover, the analysis of the σ- and π-electron contributions to the out-of-plane component of NICS (NICSzz) leads to the same qualitative and quantitative conclusions previously obtained by the analysis of the magnetically induced ring current densities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Báez-Grez, R., Ruiz, L., Pino-Rios, R., & Tiznado, W. (2018). Which NICS method is most consistent with ring current analysis? Assessment in simple monocycles. RSC Advances, 8(24), 13446–13453. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra01263f

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free