Courts of armed opposition groups: Fair trials or summary justice

91Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Courts of armed opposition groups are a frequent feature of internal armed conflicts. The Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional of El Salvador, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam of Sri Lanka and Revolutionary United Front of Sierra Leone all conducted trials in courts they convened. These courts are often criticized for failing to afford fair trial guarantees. This article takes a look at these courts and assesses the criticisms made of them, identifying precisely which due process guarantees are applicable in time of internal armed conflict and how they are interpreted. The article goes on to address the legitimacy of these courts and whether the international community should engage with them, considering some of the advantages and disadvantages engagement brings. © Oxford University Press, 2009, All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sivakumaran, S. (2009). Courts of armed opposition groups: Fair trials or summary justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7(3), 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free